USA Today has a new article on Song of the South and the Disney company's continued head-scratching over whether or not to re-release it.
Sunday, March 25, 2007
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
skip to main |
skip to sidebar
Thoughts on Popular Culture and Unpopular Culture
by Jaime J. Weinman (email me)
About Me
Blog Archive
-
▼
2007
(376)
-
▼
March
(40)
- On a Happier Note...
- WKRP DVD Not OK
- "The only thing I did at RKO of any note was lose ...
- How Odd
- Random Musical Number
- Well, That's Good
- '80s Flashback
- In Like...
- Song of the Speculation
- Carte Blanc
- One Angry TV Producer
- When, Said the Prairie Hen?
- Ye Olde Groaner
- Dorothy
- "Our survival hinges on one thing - finding someon...
- Squaw No Dance! Squaw Get-Um Firewood!
- Gilligan's Island: The Food Runs Out
- Attacking the Film that Attacked Boston
- The Most Important Creative Question in Animation ...
- Good Neighbor
- Kirk Duplicitous
- A Motion Picture Simul-Cast
- Fields of Honey
- Could You See It as a Betty Hutton?
- Joe MacDonald
- This Is Just Sad, Yet Instructive
- La Cava Arcana
- The Original Version
- Babs Bunniwalski OverSmith
- McGarrett vs. Hippies
- Good News And Bad News
- Oh, Yeah
- I'm Not Gonna Hurt Him
- Simpsons Guest Cameo, Standard Version
- The Fuller Brush Man
- Wow, They're Getting Faster
- Kip, Kip, Kipelangelo
- Errol Flynn Sings!
- Cried the Scout From Universal: "What a Juicy Litt...
- You Can't Write a Drawing
-
▼
March
(40)
2 comments:
The difference between Gone With the Wind and Song of the South is that South is considered a children's film, and as such is much more prone to scrutiny than a picture like Wind, whose primary audience is adults.
Most stories about the film, including the present AP article, pass along the mistaken belief that SOTS is not clear about the era it's set in; as if it were uncertain whether the sharecroppers are slaves or not.
In truth, the film is rather obviously set in the postbellum period. When a disappointed Uncle Remus gets set to leave the farm, he simply packs up and leaves; something he could never do if he were a slave.
Sloppy, sloppy research. At this point I'm ready to say that most of the reasons for this film's suppression are bogus, mistaken claims. Not to say that SONG OF THE SOUTH doesn't have plenty of problems; but it's being suppressed for problems it doesn't have.
Post a Comment