tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6956070.post4571350799917124919..comments2023-11-03T11:37:13.579-04:00Comments on Something Old, Nothing New: His Real Name Is Royce...Jaime J. Weinmanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15128500411119962998noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6956070.post-14041678243929897642008-07-28T02:47:00.000-04:002008-07-28T02:47:00.000-04:00"...the commentaries sound promising since the law...<I>"...the commentaries sound promising since the lawyers have apparently not banned the commentators from talking about the question I've always wondered about: which elements of the show, and which characters, were holdovers from the original Bruce Timm concept."</I><BR/><BR/>I'm flummoxed as to why there would there be <I>any</I> sticky legal issue about that? it's old, old news now and well known generally, and as far as I know Bruce is and has been for years in a position at WB where his involvement at one point would be a point of honor (as well as interest) for this old series. In other words, he's been a top producer there for eons. <BR/>I'm sure he's addressed the subject at panels and in print interviews before, hasn't he?<BR/><BR/>I'd guess you know much more about all things F! than I would and I defer to your knowledge, but I'm surprised that Warner legal would have hard and fast rules about mentioning 15 year old cartoon show facts. Seems ridiculous if so.Jenny Lerewhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06668171465801333811noreply@blogger.com